Projectile technology
P
rojectiles take a particular position within Palaeolithic studies because their initial introduction and the development of long-range hunting weaponry are considered to have significantly impacted human subsistence strategies. In most cases, the key elements of hunting equipment have disappeared as they were manufactured out of organic material, and stone points are the only evidence that is left. Accurate identification of lithic projectile armatures and the ability to determine with which weapons they were delivered are therefore important challenges and remain a matter of considerable debate. TraceoLab contributes to the efforts to recognise archaeological projectiles reliably and to gain knowledge about the details of their functioning through use-wear analysis.
The way a projectile point breaks upon impact can be observed through macroscopic and microscopic optical analysis, and certain damage patterns can be diagnostic of impact. In our projectile analyses, we emphasise the use of different scales of observation and thorough damage attribute recording in documenting and interpreting sets of wear features. Combined with extensive experimentation, these principles allow us to overcome problems of equifinality in trace formation and to reach reliable projectile identifications as well as detailed reconstructions of the hafting systems of prehistoric armatures. We study both distally mounted weapon tips and laterally hafted projectile inserts and aim to understand why different designs were opted for in prehistory.
We use state-of-the-art equipment to study physical phenomena, to document experiments and to examine wear traces. These instruments include a universal testing machine to measure the resistance of projectile components and to produce particular forms of wear in a controlled setting, and a high-speed camera used for analysing projectile flight trajectories as well as fracture phenomena. We pay particular attention to ballistics in our research and build on the experience gained from a valuable collaboration with the ballistics laboratory of the Royal Military Academy.
With the help of the production and study of an extensive experimental projectile reference collection and input from the fields of fracture mechanics and ballistics, the TraceoLab team has proposed new solutions and interpretations in the last few years that contribute to the debate on the development of prehistoric weapon systems.
Our archaeological research has provided new insights into hunting technologies used in the Middle and Late Pleistocene in Africa and Europe. We have expanded the view of Lower Palaeolithic hunting weaponry by identifying a throwing stick at Schöningen and contributed to the view of Middle Stone Age hunting equipment in South Africa by documenting the use of serrated points during MIS 5 and quartz barbs in the Howiesons Poort at Sibudu Cave. Our work has shed light on weapon technology employed by Neanderthals and provided new data on variability in Upper Palaeolithic weapon designs.
Further reading
- Conard N.J., Serangeli J., Bigga G. & Rots V., 2020 ‒ A 300,000-year-old throwing stick from Schöningen, northern Germany, documents the evolution of human hunting. Nature Ecology and Evolution 4: 690-693
- Coppe J. & Rots V., 2017 – Focus on the target. The importance of a transparent fracture terminology for understanding projectile points and projecting modes. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 12: 109-123
- Coppe J., Lepers C., Clarenne V., Delaunois E., Pirlot M. & Rots V., 2019 – Ballistic study tackles kinetic energy values of Palaeolithic weaponry. Archaeometry 61: 933-956
- Coppe J., Lepers C. & Rots V., 2022 – Projectiles under a new angle: a ballistic analysis provides an important building block to grasp Paleolithic weapon technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
- de la Peña P., Taipale N., Wadley L. & Rots V., 2018 – A techno-functional perspective on quartz micro-notches in Sibudu’s Howiesons Poort indicates the use of barbs in hunting technology. Journal of Archaeological Science 93: 166-195
- Lepers C. & Rots V., 2020 – The important role of bow choice and arrow fletching in projectile experimentation. A ballistic approach. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 34: 102613
- Rots V., 2016 – Projectiles and hafting technology. In: Iovita R. & Sano K. (eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to the study of Stone Age weaponry. Springer: 167-185
- Rots V., Coppe J. & Conard N.J., 2021 ‒ A leaf point documents hunting with spears in the Middle Paleolithic at Hohle Fels, Germany. Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Urgeschichte 2021: 1-28
- Rots V., Lentfer C., Schmid V.C., Porraz G. & Conard N.J., 2017. Pressure flaking to serrate bifacial points for the hunt during the MIS5 at Sibudu Cave (South Africa). PLoS ONE 12: e0175151
- Rots V. & Plisson H., 2014 – Projectiles and the abuse of the use-wear method in a search for impact. Journal of Archaeological Science 48: 154-165
- Taipale N., Chiotti L. & Rots V., 2022 – Why did hunting weapon design change at Abri Pataud? Lithic use-wear data on armature use and hafting around 24,000–22,000 BP. PLoS ONE 17(1): 0262185
- Tomasso A., Rots V., Purdue L., Beyries S., Buckley M., Cheval C., Cnuts D., Coppe J., Julien M.A., Grenet M., Lepers C., M’hamdi M., Simon P., Sorin S. & Porraz G., 2018 – Gravettian weaponry: 23,500-year-old evidence of a composite barbed point from Les Prés de Laure (France). Journal of Archaeological Science 100: 158-175
- Tomasso S., Rots V., Perdaens Y., Crombé P. & Meylemans E., 2015 – Hunting with trapezes at Bazel-Sluis: the results of a functional analysis. Notae Praehistoricae 35: 239-251
