Effect of taphonomy on use-wear traces and residues
A
lteration of stone tools and residues by taphonomic processes is a key challenge for functional analysis. In entering the archaeological record, stone tools are exposed to a range of taphonomic processes, including trampling and exposure to sun, rain and wind, and later, after their burial, to various sediment processes such as bioturbation, cryoturbation, fluvial action, solifluction, and sediment diagenesis. This leads to the removal, transformation, and destruction of functional residues on stone tools and to the alteration of lithic edges and surfaces by mechanical and chemical processes. Excavation and post-excavation artefact processing and handling can also remove or add evidence. Archaeological residues and wear are therefore not usually comparable to those on freshly produced experimental tools, and analysts need to be able to account for the effects of taphonomy to reach reliable interpretations.
TraceoLab employs a two-pronged approach to cope with altered materials: 1) we base our archaeological analyses on a detailed understanding of the site context, and 2) we conduct experiments to simulate postdepositional processes and their effects. During archaeological analysis, available geoarchaeological data helps us understand the details of site formation and sediment chemistry in burial contexts. When possible, we also participate in on-going excavations of sites we are studying to benefit from first-hand field observations. The experimental work we have carried out thus far has involved burial, fire, and trampling experiments as well as the use of a climate chamber to replicate freeze-thaw cycles and the testing of the effect of ultraviolet light on residues and lithics with the help of a UV chamber.
Further reading
- Barton H., Torrence R. & Fullagar R., 1998 – Clues to stone tool function re-examined: comparing starch grain frequencies on used and unused obsidian artefacts. Journal of Archaeological Science 25: 1231-1238
- Cnuts D., Tomasso S. & Rots V., 2018 – The role of fire in the life of an adhesive. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 25: 839-862
- Cnuts D., Peresani M. & Rots V., 2022. The contribution of stone tool residues in reconstructing Late Pleistocene hominin stone tool behaviour at Grotta di Fumane, Italy. Quaternary Science Reviews 297: 107829
- Croft S., Monnier G., Radini A., Little A. & Milner N., 2016 – Lithic residue survival and characterisation at Star Carr: a burial experiment. Internet Archaeology 42
- de la Peña P., Taipale N., Wadley L. & Rots V., 2018 – A techno-functional perspective on quartz micro-notches in Sibudu’s Howiesons Poort reveals the use of barbs in hunting technology. Journal of Archaeological Science 93: 166-195
- Langejans G.H.J., 2010 – Remains of the day-preservation of organic micro-residues on stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 971-985
- Levi Sala I., 1996 – A study of microscopic polish on flint implements. Oxford: Archaeopress (BAR International Series, 629)
- Michel M., Cnuts D. & Rots V., 2019 – Freezing in-sight: the effect of frost cycles on use-wear and residues on flint tools. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 11: 5423-5443
- Michel M. & Rots V., 2022 – Into the light: the effect of UV light on flint tool surfaces, residues and adhesives. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 43: 103479
- Monnier G. & May K., 2019 – Documenting the degradation of animal-tissue residues on experimental stone tools: a multi-analytical approach. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 11: 6803-6827
- Pedergnana A., 2020 – “All that glitters is not gold”: evaluating the nature of the relationship between archeological residues and stone tool function. Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology 3: 225-254
- Taipale N., Cnuts D., Chiotti L., Conard N.J. & Rots V., 2022 – What about apatite? Possibilities and limitations of recognising bone mineral residues on stone tools. Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology 5: 21
- Weiner S., 2010 – Microarchaeology: beyond the visible archaeological record. Cambridge: Cambridge University
